In India, there is a lot of pessimism among the bourgeois about political institutions. There is criticism from the middle class about the way in which democratic institutions have suffered at the hands of the very men responsible for running these. But, few in this cribbing middle class realize that the decay of political institutions is nothing but consequence of their own apathy and cynicism towards the polity of the country.
There is no clear cut definition of middle class [1] in India but there are rough guesses of who constitutes it. It includes government officials, civil society members, corporate employees, teachers, educationists, researchers, small businessmen etc. Although the classification is not perfect but one thing is sure that these are people who have benefited the most of the 65 years of independence and they run the country in several ways and have a big say in the making of public policies of the country.
The question arises what are the values that they cherish and aspire for? Looking at the culture of India’s middle class [2] in the present, we find that these people value education, emphasize merit and professionalism, celebrate entrepreneurship, value security and safety, and have a global outlook, but are very risk averse, and apolitical. Their romanticism for the last word is the key reason for their apathy towards the Indian political system. There is no shortage of negative thoughts that come to the Indian bourgeois mind when they think of Indian political life viz., corruption, scam, vote bank, position, dynasty, scandal and so on.
One of my key observations is that increasingly, democracy is being delegitimized in this country. Many people are being tempted to look at undemocratic answers. For instance, there is a growing belief that the rise of the unelected is better for the country than the elected which is a perilous misbelief. For example, the judges can name their own successors i.e. judiciary is totally independent; no effective democracy permits that to happen. Unquestionably, this is a travesty of the constitution. This needs to be improved; otherwise, people will fall to the enticement that a non-democratic organ of the government is always a better organ. The middle class believes that a politician by definition is malicious and politics by itself is wicked; hence anything that is non-political is dreamily acceptable.
Although I am not denying that there is much that is wrong. But they need to remind themselves of the goods that their democratic system and political institutions have delivered before they start reprimanding the politicians. India can be claimed as an operative democracy on several benchmarks. Firstly, it has competitive elections and the system has been able to throw out governments persistently. The best example is of the all-powerful Congress thrown out of power during 1977 elections in response to the tyranny during emergency. Secondly, there is presence of real political freedom in the country. For instance, there is a mutual respect between winning and losing political parties unlike neighbouring countries like Pakistan where losing elections leads to suffering at the hands of the winner. Thirdly, the elected government has a strong say in parliamentary affairs. These are values of Indian democracy worth celebrating.
While countries are fighting and dying for the right to vote, the Indian middle class had it since independence and they are not bothered at all. Voting percentages in urban India, where educated middle class resides are remarkably less. In contrast in rural India people value the right to vote and turnout is high. [3] There is a deep belief among the middle class that vote is the weapon of the weak. After 65 years of independence, there are campaigns just to motivate people to exercise their franchise. This is a sad state of affairs. The question arises - Why is there such incongruence between the political world and what the Indian bourgeois espouse?
India’s educated middle class is detached from politics and not concerned but even if they wanted they are not acquainted enough about the contemporary issues, the details of the parties and their manifestos and even modern Indian history. History for them ended in 1947 as the high school syllabus includes history till that. Everything that happened afterwards is only known in bits and pieces. But large number of the bourgeois has not really engaged them with issues of contemporary polity. The TV talks and superfluous stuff do not really count; they are just different themes but the same yelling. Going forth and understanding the critical and burning issues of the day is very important for participation.
This disinterest of Indian middle class in politics is reflected in the abysmal results for some really courageous people in elections. For instance, in 2009 elections Meera Sanyal (Mumbai South), Captain Gopinath (Bangalore South), and Mallika Sarabhai (Gandhinagar), contested from 4 constituencies which have one of the highest percentages of urban educated middle classes. They all got votes below 5%. Undeniably, these are people with incredible guts and vow to their morals and all of them are middle class icons. But, they had to face embarrassment for their political participation. There audacity needs to be rewarded if India has to change. If the Indian bourgeois wants to see young, dynamic and vibrant politicians, they need to elect people like these, to inspire more.
In absence of educated people’s votes, politicians have to seek uneducated votes which have become costly. The investment of huge amounts of money to buy votes and liquor in elections has become indispensable for winning election. In other words, expenditure does not assure triumph but non-expenditure warranties loss. This is the reason why noble folks come last which reduces incentives of these people to join politics. The educated middle class needs to understand this and participate. They also need to educate the uneducated and uninformed voters which in turn can lead to improvements in the scenario.
Why do we see these kinds of outcomes? Why the educated middle class seem to be behaving in this particular manner? One simple answer is because they can afford to do this. They already dominate the sectors that matter. They are in government, although not the political leadership perhaps, but the government that makes the country run i.e. the bureaucracy, civil services etc. They form a large chunk of employees in businesses i.e. the private sector, where most of them aspire to go. They are also in key positions in the media. In terms of influencing public policy and results they have a strong say. They can get what they need without much effort and so why bother about electoral politics? The political world does not matter to the middle class and they think they can do without it.
If we gaze back at the freedom movement, most of the educated folks were at the forefront of the movement. If we look at Jawaharlal Nehru [4] and Subhash Chandra Bose [5], both were well educated but realizing the importance of freedom, they plunged into the freedom movement. This involvement of urban educated middle class was just not a peculiarity. Even in our generation there are people who have engaged in public service and embarked in public movement. Prominent examples are Medha Patkar [6] (Anti-dam movement), Aruna Roy (Right to Information Act) [7] etc. There are others who have brought innovative technology and business solutions at the grassroots for the masses. Examples are Husk power systems [8] in Bihar, Vijay Mahajan [9] inspiring the Microfinance sector.
A phenomenon which I see much more today is one where a lot of people are establishing or running or being involved with NGOs, civil societies etc. They actually manage to bring about policy change and impact policy outcomes but they are too small to impact the larger masses. There is one principal feature that they want to be apolitical shying away from direct political engagement.
But that’s not everything; we can also see signs of reengagement in anti-reservation campaigns against OBC quota in higher educational institutions brought by government in 2008. This is an example of groups emerging and engaging in political demonstrations and Other examples are country wide demonstrations for Lokpal bill i.e. India against corruption (led by Anna Hazare) [10] and against the recent 16th December Delhi rape case. [11] Moreover we have extremely innovative facebook driven protests etc. which are some of the positives that is coming out. But we need to ask ourselves is this enough.
These are erratic and occasional incidents and no tangible long lasting movement seems to emerge. What does everyone wants to indulge in? Is getting neutral systemic solutions, going to make all the transformation?
It is the people who matter and not the institution. Change in political culture requires a deep understanding of the issues and the middle class need to identify their roles in changing this, stepping out of their comfort zones. The bourgeois needs to realize that no one else but it is they who are responsible for the political culture. The answer to this cynicism is not apathy but active participation and involvement. Looking at Indian political class closely it is discovered that it is not all about the negative ideas that we talked at the beginning. There are people devoted to public service, zealous to work for development and who devote full time to politics and public service, have compassion and audacity and are alacritous to sacrifice and who are leaders who can inspire. They can look at people like Nitish Kumar [12], among others.
Politics was about people like Gandhi and Mandela and that kind of role models exist, but today the middle-class is in a state of abjuration. They negate that politics is a full time commitment. If that is so how are our politicians going to survive and how are they going to run their families? Elections cost money, running of political party costs money, where is that going to come from? They say no to increasing of politician’s salary, they want election spending limits to be low instead of finding newer ways to level the electoral playing field. And therefore, they end up creating only crooked politicians who can subsist and flourish and none of them who want a healthier politics is willing to spend anything to make that dream a reality.
It needs to be reformed. They need to barricade into this and contribute their ideas, time, dynamism, money and resources either by being active representatives or by working with some causes. Obviously, it is very trying and perplexing because it is amorphous, with no surety of triumph, but they have to keep going on with it. People argue against it saying that during freedom movement it was a different scenario. Nobel laureate, Amaratya Sen points out that “1947 was just political freedom. True freedom is when each and every individual can live to his/her potential. It means freedom from poverty, ill health, illiteracy, ability to make your own choices and hold your head high without social discrimination. ”
Thinking about Sen’s argument they need to ask themselves that are they free from these evils of daily life like poverty, ill-health, and illiteracy? The answer is no. Then India needs to fight many more freedom movements. India needs their educated middle class to lead in this movement and reward the courage shown by a valiant few by electing them as their representatives and increase their say in the country’s politics. I hope, it is by this engagement in politics, involvement, participation and contribution, India will get a better political system. And thus the apathetic attitudes of the Indian educated middle classes need to be changed to transform the landscape of the corrupt Indian political culture.
Word Count: [1959 words]
Bibliography
[1] The Great Indian Middle Class. Varma, Pavan. 1998. New Delhi: Penguin.
[2] Middle Class Values in India and Western Europe. Ahmad, Imtiaz and Helmut Reifeld. 2003. New Delhi: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.
[3] Lectures of Dr. Rajeev Gowda (Head, Public Policy, IIM Bangalore) and J.P. Narayan (Founder, Lok Satta Party, Andhra Pradesh, India) on TED
[4] http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2009-04-18/mumbai/28029725_1_indian-politics-swing-votes-total-votes
[5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jawaharlal_Nehru
[6] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subhash_Chandra_Bose
[7] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medha_Patkar
[8] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aruna_Roy
[9] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Husk_Power_Systems
[10] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vijay_Mahajan
[11] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India_Against_Corruption
[12] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Delhi_gang_rape_case
[13] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitish_kumar
No comments:
Post a Comment